I stopped at Wegmans tonight on my way home from the day’s activities, just to grab something quickly. On my way toward the back of the store, I walked through the personal care/cosmetics aisle and, as I often do, took a quick glance at some of the ‘natural’ and ‘organic’ claims on the products.
One in particular jumped out at me this time. It was called ‘Organic Wear.’ When I turned it over it said that the ingredients were 100% natural and 16% organic. That’s right, just 16%. And they call it ‘Organic Wear’?
With food products, there is a required minimum of 70% organic ingredients in order to use even the phrase ‘made with organic ingredients’ on the product. To claim the product is ‘organic’ actually requires at least 95% organic ingredients. And this is what most people expect when they see ‘organic’ on any label. Not so with personal care and cosmetic products – they can and do get away with misleading labels all the time.
And the fact that the remaining 84% is ‘natural’ means very little when you consider the chemical processes that personal care and cosmetic companies can put their ‘natural’ ingredients through during formulation and still call them ‘natural.’ (see Part 2 of the 5-part report below).
The particular product I saw tonight was certified by Eco-Cert, which I have recently learned is the lowest and most permissive of the organic certification standards out there. (see article below and Part 2 of my report for a general discussion on sub-par organic standards and ‘natural’ marketing terminology in general).
Free 5-part report on evaluating ‘natural’ personal care products.
Various ‘organic’ standards for personal care products.